Castro County, Texas Eviction Risk: Very Low
3 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Dimmitt (2.5) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #217 of 254 TX counties
5k residents · 3 cities · 3 tracts
Castro County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord13.8%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Castro County, TX, tenants prevail in roughly 13.8% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline26dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Castro County, TX until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 26 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$0.9–3.4klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Castro County, TX costs landlords $863 to $3,440 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$88021% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Castro County, TX is $880 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 21% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters39.1%of households39.1% of occupied housing units in Castro County, TX are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty14.7%2.5% unemp.14.7% of Castro County, TX residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 2.5%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Castro County's 2.1/10 score reflects a Very Low eviction risk environment anchored by landlord-favorable Texas state statute, no local rent control, and a stable agricultural rental market with average rent of $880 per month. Ranked 217th of 254 Texas counties, Castro County sits in the lower-risk third of the state, with 216 counties carrying higher risk scores.
How Castro County ranks in Texas
Landlord guides for Texas
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Dimmitt | 4,107 | 2.1 | 19.6% | $879 | Rep |
| 002 | Hart | 919 | 2.2 | 25.0% | $883 | Rep |
| 003 | Nazareth | 273 | 2.5 | 22.2% | $880 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Castro County sits on the southern edge of the Texas eviction laws Panhandle, a sparsely populated agricultural county of 5,299 residents where wheat, cotton, and cattle operations define the local economy far more than any residential rental market. The county's eviction risk score of 2.1/10 (Very Low) places it 217th out of 254 Texas counties - squarely in the lower-risk third of the state, with 216 counties carrying higher risk and only 37 showing lower risk. For landlords operating here, that ranking reflects the structural reality of a small rural market governed entirely by the state's landlord-friendly statutes, with no local tenant-protection ordinances layered on top.
The county's three incorporated cities span a tight score range of 2.1 to 2.5, meaning landlords face broadly consistent conditions across all three communities. Dimmitt - the county seat and by far the largest community, with 4,107 residents - scores 2.1/10. Hart, a smaller farming community of 919 residents to the north, scores 2.2/10. Nazareth, at just 273 residents, carries the county's highest individual score at 2.5/10, though even that figure remains well within the Low risk tier. The narrow spread between all three cities reflects Castro County's demographic and economic uniformity: a single-industry agricultural base, stable household formation, and very limited turnover in the rental stock. Average rent across the county runs $880 per month, and renters make up 39.1% of households - a notably high renter share for a rural Panhandle county of this size, likely tied to seasonal and migrant agricultural labor patterns rather than a conventional urban rental market.
Rent burden sits at 20.7%, below the 30% threshold that housing economists use to flag financial stress, and the poverty rate of 14.7% is elevated relative to statewide averages but not unusual for a small agricultural county this far from any major metro. Texas eviction laws law statewide preempts any local rent control under TX Local Gov Code §214.902, so there is no possibility of a city-level ordinance complicating operations in Dimmitt, Hart, or Nazareth. Just cause is not required for non-renewal under Texas eviction laws statute, and landlords may issue a 3-day notice to vacate for non-payment (Tex. Prop. Code § 24.005(a)) without a cure period for habitually delinquent tenants, or invoke a same-section 3-day notice for lease violations. Uncontested eviction proceedings in Texas eviction laws typically resolve in 21 to 30 days from filing, with court costs running $54 to $125 at filing plus a sheriff lockout fee of $50 to $175 - among the more straightforward and cost-predictable eviction processes in the country.
Castro County's Very Low eviction risk score of 2.1/10 is consistent with the broader pattern seen across rural Texas eviction laws Panhandle counties: thin rental markets, moderate rent burden, and an operating environment governed exclusively by state statute rather than local overlay. The county ranks 217th of 254 statewide, meaning the vast majority of Texas counties present more challenging conditions for landlords than Castro does.
Historical eviction filings in Castro County
From 2000 to 2018, eviction filings in Castro County declined 11%. The peak was 27 filings in 2003.1
- 92000
- 27Peak (2003)
- 82018
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Castro County compares
Castro County's 2.1/10 score comes in below the Texas statewide average of 2.6/10, and its rank of 217th of 254 puts it in the lower-risk third of the state. Nearby peer counties - including Bailey, Childress, and Yoakum - score at comparably low levels, consistent with the broader rural Panhandle pattern. All share the same state-preempted no-rent-control framework and 3-day notice timeline, so the differences between them are driven primarily by local rent burden and demographic composition rather than legal structure.