Crockett County, Texas Eviction Risk: Very Low
2 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Ozona (1.9) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #246 of 254 TX counties
2k residents · 2 cities · 1 tracts
Crockett County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord8.9%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Crockett County, TX, tenants prevail in roughly 8.9% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline24dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Crockett County, TX until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 24 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.1–3.9klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Crockett County, TX costs landlords $1,124 to $3,944 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$55811% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Crockett County, TX is $558 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 11% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters23.4%of households23.4% of occupied housing units in Crockett County, TX are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty3.8%3.0% unemp.3.8% of Crockett County, TX residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 3.0%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Crockett County scores 1.9/10 (Very Low risk), with individual community scores ranging from 1.8 to 1.9. This is well below the Texas statewide average of 2.6/10. Ranked 246th of 254 Texas counties. 245 counties carry higher eviction risk; only 8 are lower.
How Crockett County ranks in Texas
Landlord guides for Texas
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Ozona | 2,405 | 1.9 | 11.0% | $558 | Rep |
| 002 | Sheffield | 74 | 1.8 | 11.0% | $558 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Crockett County sits in the remote Trans-Pecos region of west Texas, covering roughly 2,807 square miles of Chihuahuan Desert rangeland with a total population of just 2,479 residents. For landlords and property investors evaluating this market, the county's eviction risk profile is among the most favorable in Texas eviction laws. The county scores 1.9/10 (Very Low risk), placing it 246th out of 254 Texas eviction laws counties, where rank 1 represents the highest eviction risk. Only 8 Texas counties sit below Crockett in risk, while 245 counties carry more risk for landlords - a useful frame when comparing west Texas markets.
The rental market here is compact. Ozona, the county seat and by far the largest community with 2,405 residents, is the county's only true rental market. It scores 1.9/10, matching the county average almost exactly. Sheffield, a tiny unincorporated crossroads community of 74 people along US-290, rounds out the county's tracked communities at 1.8/10 - the lowest score in the county and a reflection of its minimal rental activity. The score spread from 1.8 to 1.9 is narrow, which is typical of a county with just two tracked localities and very limited tenant-protection infrastructure at either the local or county level. Both the county average and Ozona's score align at the same level, meaning that for practical purposes Ozona's market dynamics define Crockett County's risk profile entirely.
Several structural factors keep Crockett County's eviction risk exceptionally low. Renters make up only 23.4% of occupied housing units, well below the Texas statewide average - meaning the tenant pool is small and largely stable relative to the overall population. Average rent runs about $558 per month, and the average rent burden sits at just 11% of household income, compared to Texas statewide rent burdens that often run two to three times higher in urban metros. The poverty rate is 3.8%, which by Texas rural standards is low. These indicators collectively point to a market where tenant financial distress - the primary driver of eviction filings - is structurally contained. Texas also preempts local rent control under TX Local Gov Code §214.902, so no city or county in the state can impose rent caps or just-cause eviction requirements, a major structural advantage for landlords operating anywhere in the state including Crockett County.
Crockett County's Very Low risk designation and 246th-of-254 ranking reflect a combination of low renter density, minimal rent burden at 11% of income, and Texas eviction laws's uniformly landlord-favorable statutory framework. With average rents of $558 and a poverty rate of 3.8%, the conditions that drive eviction filings in larger Texas eviction laws markets are largely absent here. The county's score of 1.9/10 sits comfortably below 2.6, the Texas statewide average, reinforcing its position as one of the lower-risk operating environments in the state.
Historical eviction filings in Crockett County
From 2000 to 2018, eviction filings in Crockett County increased 333%. The peak was 17 filings in 2015.1
- 32000
- 17Peak (2015)
- 132018
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Crockett County compares
Crockett County's 1.9/10 score and 246th-of-254 ranking place it firmly in the lower-risk portion of the Texas county landscape, well below the Texas statewide average of 2.6/10. Among peer counties in west Texas, Crockett sits in similar territory to Culberson and Donley counties, which carry comparable risk profiles, while Crane and Collingsworth counties run slightly higher risk and Knox County runs modestly above that cluster. None of these peer counties carry the structural risk factors found in Texas's larger metro-adjacent markets, but Crockett's combination of extremely low rent burden and minimal renter share puts it at the favorable end even within this low-risk peer group.