Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Beasley Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48157675402 ·
Fort Bend, TX · pop 2,867 · 36% of tract blocks fall in Beasley
Census tract 48157675402 sits in Beasley, Texas eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. On the national scale it ranks #43,680 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 30% of renter households, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,167 a month while the average household earns $73,967 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 39% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12%Stable renters 27%Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units862
Renter share38.9%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate8.3%
Median income$73,967
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Beasley
Moderate
Within county
82th percentile
#25 of 133 tracts In Fort Bend
High
Within state
44th percentile
#3,847 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
National
43th percentile
#48,083 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Beasley and the region
Centroid at 29.5492, -95.8860 · click any tract to drill in
Why Beasley scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Beasley
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.3% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,167 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Beasley
9.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Beasley
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Beasley
8.3
How Beasley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 83
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Beasley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Fort Bend County average of 4.8 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48157675402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48157675402?
Census tract 48157675402 in Beasley scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48157675402?
Median gross rent is $1,167/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48157675402?
8.3% of residents in tract 48157675402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,867.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48157675402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 81th, household 64th, minority 83th, housing 75th.
Q5
How does tract 48157675402 compare to Beasley overall?
Tract 48157675402 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Beasley at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Beasley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.