Census Tract · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally
Lakeport Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 48183010502 ·
Gregg, TX · pop 2,834 · 21% of tract blocks fall in Lakeport
How risky is Lakeport for landlords? Census tract 48183010502 scores 5.7/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $738 a month against an average household income of $67,222 a year, roughly 13% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%Stable renters 13%Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,102
Renter share25.7%
SVI overall0.55
Poverty rate18.0%
Median income$67,222
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Lakeport
Moderate
Within county
45th percentile
#17 of 30 tracts In Gregg
Moderate
Within state
66th percentile
#2,323 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
63th percentile
#31,159 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lakeport and the region
Centroid at 32.3972, -94.7520 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lakeport scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lakeport
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.2
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
18.0% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$738 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lakeport
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lakeport
5.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lakeport
8.0
How Lakeport compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 55
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lakeport, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Gregg County average of 5.4 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 55th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48183010502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48183010502?
Census tract 48183010502 in Lakeport scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48183010502?
Median gross rent is $738/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48183010502?
18.0% of residents in tract 48183010502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,834.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48183010502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 55th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 92th, minority 71th, housing 16th.
Q5
How does tract 48183010502 compare to Lakeport overall?
Tract 48183010502 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Lakeport at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lakeport; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.