Census Tract · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally
Tatum Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 48401950101 ·
Rusk County, TX · pop 3,159 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Tatum
Eviction risk in Tatum centers on tract 48401950101, which scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 3,159 residents. On the national scale it ranks #65,821 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
32% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $928 a month against an average household income of $80,750 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 17%Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,149
Renter share25.4%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate17.8%
Median income$80,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Tatum
Moderate
Within county
85th percentile
#3 of 14 tracts In Rusk County
High
Within state
62th percentile
#2,641 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
59th percentile
#34,332 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Tatum and the region
Centroid at 32.3330, -94.5550 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tatum scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tatum
2.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.2
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
17.8% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$928 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tatum
6.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tatum
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tatum
7.0
How Tatum compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 54
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tatum, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Rusk County average of 4.3 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48401950101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48401950101?
Census tract 48401950101 in Tatum scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48401950101?
Median gross rent is $928/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48401950101?
17.8% of residents in tract 48401950101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,159.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48401950101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 43th, minority 58th, housing 40th.
Q5
How does tract 48401950101 compare to Tatum overall?
Tract 48401950101 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Tatum at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tatum; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.