Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 48423001804 Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48423001804 · Smith, TX · pop 4,483

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 48423001804 (Smith, Texas) comes in at 4.3/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 17th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

11% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,353 a month against an average household income of $72,074 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 20% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,170
Renter share22.1%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate29.2%
Median income$72,074

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 56 tracts In Smith
High
Within state
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#2,323 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,159 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Smith and the region

Centroid at 32.3941, -95.1001 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 48423001804 scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
29.2% poverty · this tract
7.3
Supply constraint
$1,353 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 48423001804 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 48423001804 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 001804County: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 48423001804

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 7.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Texas eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Smith County average of 4.4 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48423001804

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48423001804?

Census tract 48423001804 in Smith scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48423001804?

Median gross rent is $1,353/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 11% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48423001804?

29.2% of residents in tract 48423001804 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,483.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48423001804?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 83th, household 90th, minority 71th, housing 56th.
Related