Neighborhood · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Hidden Hills Eviction Risk: Lower , Port Washington
Tract 55089630100 ·
Ozaukee County, WI · pop 2,776 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
How risky is Hidden Hills in Port Washington for landlords? Census tract 55089630100 scores 4.1/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 13% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 46% of renter households, a severe level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,152 a month against an average household income of $83,071 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 35% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 18%Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,400
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$83,071
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Hidden Hills
Very Low
Within parent city
67th percentile
#2 of 4 tracts In Port Washington
Elevated
Within county
75th percentile
#6 of 21 tracts In Ozaukee County
High
Within state
25th percentile
#1,143 of 1,528 tracts In Wisconsin
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Port Washington and the region
Centroid at 43.3890, -87.8750 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hidden Hills scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Port Washington
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Wisconsin legislature & governorship
2.9
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,152 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Port Washington
3.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Port Washington
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Port Washington
3.9
How Hidden Hills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
25%Socioeconomic
6%Household composition
7%Racial/ethnic minority
58%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
119Total filings over 17 yrs
1.20%Avg annual filing rate
3.0%Peak (2008)
7Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2017
Filings climbed 250% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hidden Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.5%Housing insecurity
5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
10.3%Food insecurity
10.9%SNAP enrollment
6.1%Transit barriers
7.0%No health insurance
16.2%Frequent mental distress
28.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hidden Hills
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Port Washington eviction laws, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Ozaukee County average of 3.7 and below the Wisconsin statewide average of 4.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 19th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 55089630100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 55089630100?
Census tract 55089630100 in the Hidden Hills neighborhood scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 55089630100?
Median gross rent is $1,152/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 55089630100?
7.3% of residents in tract 55089630100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,776.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 55089630100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 25th, household 6th, minority 7th, housing 58th.
Q5
Is tract 55089630100 considered part of Hidden Hills?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 55089630100 fall within Hidden Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 55089630100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 119 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 55089630100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.20% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 55089630100 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 55089630100 compare to Port Washington overall?
Tract 55089630100 scores 2.3/10, lower than the parent city of Port Washington at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Port Washington eviction laws; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Port Washington
Top eight tracts in Port Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.