Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Park Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Scottsboro

Tract 01071950902 · Jackson County, AL · pop 4,175 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

For landlords sizing up the Park Place area of Scottsboro, census tract 01071950902 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.4/10. On the national scale it ranks #80,056 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $769 monthly, set against $76,761 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 6% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 4% Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,689
Renter share6.2%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$76,761

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Park Place
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Scottsboro
Very Low
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 16 tracts In Jackson County
Very Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#1,012 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Scottsboro and the region

Centroid at 34.6392, -86.0219 · click any tract to drill in

Why Park Place scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Scottsboro
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
1.6
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$769 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Scottsboro
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Scottsboro
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Scottsboro
6.5

How Park Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Park Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 950902Scottsboro: 2.12.1Scottsboroparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Park Place. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Park Place

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Scottsboro eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jackson County average of 4.1 and below the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 01071950902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01071950902?

Census tract 01071950902 in the Park Place neighborhood scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01071950902?

Median gross rent is $769/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01071950902?

1.7% of residents in tract 01071950902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,175.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01071950902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 63th, minority 15th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 01071950902 considered part of Park Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01071950902 fall within Park Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 01071950902 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01071950902 compare to Scottsboro overall?

Tract 01071950902 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Scottsboro at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Scottsboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Scottsboro

Top eight tracts in Scottsboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related