Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Jefferson Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Irondale

Tract 01073012701 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 4,287 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 01073012701 covers part of the Jefferson Park area of Irondale, AL, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,287 residents. Against Jefferson County at 46.3%, 16% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 21% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,846
Renter share25.5%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$82,370

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jefferson Park
Moderate
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Irondale
High
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#115 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Low
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#816 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irondale and the region

Centroid at 33.5446, -86.6466 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jefferson Park scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$911 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irondale
6.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irondale
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irondale
6.3

How Jefferson Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jefferson Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0127014.2Irondaleparent city4.3Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 59Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 2.32%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.7%Peak (2012)
  • 5Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 01073012701
Filings dropped 29% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jefferson Park

Average gross rent is $911, 31% below the Irondale average. The main counterweight is state political climate at 1.8/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10. Against the Jefferson County average of 4.3, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.9 points.

Court records carry 59 eviction filings across 10 observed years. The worst year on record was 2012, when 2.7% of renter households were served.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Birmingham. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 2.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 29th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 13% of average household income of $82,370, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073012701

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073012701?

Census tract 01073012701 in the Jefferson Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073012701?

Median gross rent is $911/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073012701?

10.1% of residents in tract 01073012701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,287.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073012701?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 14th, minority 55th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 01073012701 considered part of Jefferson Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073012701 fall within Jefferson Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073012701?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01073012701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.32% of renter households, peaking at 2.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01073012701 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01073012701 compare to Irondale overall?

Tract 01073012701 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Irondale at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irondale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 01073012701 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Irondale

Top eight tracts in Irondale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related