Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally
Red Hill Heights Eviction Risk: Lower , McCalla
Tract 01073014104 ·
Jefferson County, AL · pop 3,763 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 01073014104 covers the Red Hill Heights area of McCalla in Alabama. Home to 3,763 residents, it scores 4.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #61,486 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,188 a month while the average household earns $73,750 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 17%Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,389
Renter share21.6%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate13.8%
Median income$73,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Red Hill Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 4 tracts In McCalla
Very High
Within county
29th percentile
#134 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Low
Within state
25th percentile
#1,083 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across McCalla and the region
Centroid at 33.3456, -87.0415 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Hill Heights scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from McCalla
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
13.8% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$1,188 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from McCalla
5.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from McCalla
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from McCalla
4.6
How Red Hill Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 72
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
51%Socioeconomic
91%Household composition
69%Racial/ethnic minority
66%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
246Total filings over 11 yrs
5.47%Avg annual filing rate
7.5%Peak (2006)
26Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Filings climbed 189% over the past 11 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
15.4%Housing insecurity
10.5%Utility-shutoff threat
20.0%Food insecurity
14.1%SNAP enrollment
9.9%Transit barriers
9.1%No health insurance
16.3%Frequent mental distress
36.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Hill Heights
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 5.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from McCalla eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 72nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 15.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 01073014104
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073014104?
Census tract 01073014104 in the Red Hill Heights neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01073014104?
Median gross rent is $1,188/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01073014104?
13.8% of residents in tract 01073014104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,763.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01073014104?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 91th, minority 69th, housing 66th.
Q5
Is tract 01073014104 considered part of Red Hill Heights?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073014104 fall within Red Hill Heights (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01073014104?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 246 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 01073014104 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.47% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 01073014104 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 01073014104 compare to McCalla overall?
Tract 01073014104 scores 3.1/10, higher than the parent city of McCalla at 2.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from McCalla eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in McCalla
Top eight tracts in McCalla ranked by composite eviction-risk score.