Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw
Tract 01097007500 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,261 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 01097007500, home to 1,261 residents in Alabama Village in Chickasaw, scores 6.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 86% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 76% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $914 a month against an average household income of $28,656 a year, roughly 38% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region
Centroid at 30.7432, -88.0818 · click any tract to drill in
Why Alabama Village scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Alabama Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 21%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 91Total filings over 10 yrs
- 3.20%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.3%Peak (2006)
- 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.1%Housing insecurity
- 22.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 42.9%Food insecurity
- 39.5%SNAP enrollment
- 20.3%Transit barriers
- 13.4%No health insurance
- 18.5%Frequent mental distress
- 46.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village
The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chickasaw, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Mobile County average of 4.9 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 57th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 91 eviction filings here over 10 tracked years, with about 3.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.3% of renter households in 2006.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 01097007500
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097007500?
What is the average rent in tract 01097007500?
What is the poverty rate in tract 01097007500?
How socially vulnerable is tract 01097007500?
Is tract 01097007500 considered part of Alabama Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097007500?
What share of households in tract 01097007500 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 01097007500 compare to Chickasaw overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw
Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.