Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw

Tract 01097007500 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,261 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 01097007500, home to 1,261 residents in Alabama Village in Chickasaw, scores 6.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 82nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 86% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 76% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $914 a month against an average household income of $28,656 a year, roughly 38% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 3% Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units495
Renter share23.0%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate24.1%
Median income$28,656

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Alabama Village
Low
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Chickasaw
Low
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
High
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#351 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region

Centroid at 30.7432, -88.0818 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alabama Village scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
24.1% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$914 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.9

How Alabama Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alabama Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 007500Chickasaw: 2.42.4Chickasawparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 91Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.20%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.3%Peak (2006)
  • 8Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010970075002001: 7 filings (1.94/100 renter HHs)2002: 8 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)2006: 17 filings (5.32/100 renter HHs)2007: 12 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2008: 13 filings (4.07/100 renter HHs)2009: 12 filings (3.76/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (1.62/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.62/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (2.43/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (5.30/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village

The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Chickasaw, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Mobile County average of 4.9 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 57th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 91 eviction filings here over 10 tracked years, with about 3.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.3% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097007500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097007500?

Census tract 01097007500 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097007500?

Median gross rent is $914/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 86% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097007500?

24.1% of residents in tract 01097007500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,261.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097007500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 11th, minority 96th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 01097007500 considered part of Alabama Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097007500 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097007500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 91 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097007500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.20% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097007500 struggle to pay rent?

About 29.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097007500 compare to Chickasaw overall?

Tract 01097007500 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw

Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related