Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #21,564 of 84,120 nationally

Alabama Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Chickasaw

Tract 01097005100 · Mobile County, AL · pop 1,735 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 01097005100 sits in the Alabama Village area of Chickasaw, AL, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.7/10. It is home to 1,735 residents. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 24% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units503
Renter share49.5%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate37.4%
Median income$33,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Alabama Village
Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Chickasaw
Low
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Chickasaw and the region

Centroid at 30.7619, -88.0886 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alabama Village scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Chickasaw
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
37.4% poverty · this tract
9.3
Supply constraint
$1,100 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Chickasaw
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Chickasaw
8.6

How Alabama Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alabama Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 005100Chickasaw: 4.34.3Chickasawparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 101Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2007)
  • 3Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010970051002001: 9 filings (5.00/100 renter HHs)2002: 13 filings (7.22/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)2007: 15 filings (4.40/100 renter HHs)2008: 9 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2009: 9 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2014: 7 filings (2.95/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (5.91/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (1.26/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 67% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alabama Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alabama Village

The dominant input is economic stress at 9.3/10. SNAP participation runs 36.1% against 15.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 37%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $33,750 and the ratio lands at 39%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.6/10. It sits 1.7 points above the Mobile County average of 4.0. Housing insecurity runs 28.1% against 14.2% nationally.

Against Mobile County at 43.6%, 52% of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 101 evictions over 10 years of observation. Average gross rent is $1,100, 15% above the Chickasaw average.

Filings peaked in 2007 at 4.4% of renter households. In a typical year about 4.0% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 74% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.2/10.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097005100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097005100?

Census tract 01097005100 in the Alabama Village neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097005100?

Median gross rent is $1,100/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097005100?

37.4% of residents in tract 01097005100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,735.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097005100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 61th, minority 77th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 01097005100 considered part of Alabama Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097005100 fall within Alabama Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097005100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 101 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097005100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.95% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097005100 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097005100 compare to Chickasaw overall?

Tract 01097005100 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Chickasaw at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Chickasaw; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Chickasaw

Top eight tracts in Chickasaw ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related