Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Eva Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 01103005601 · Morgan County, AL · pop 3,515 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Eva

Census tract 01103005601 belongs to Eva, Alabama. It is home to 3,515 residents and scores 4.5/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 24% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 50% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 37% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $875 monthly, set against $64,423 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 9% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,190
Renter share17.7%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate13.6%
Median income$64,423

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Eva
Very Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 31 tracts In Morgan County
Moderate
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#1,012 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Low
National
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Eva and the region

Centroid at 34.3614, -86.6584 · click any tract to drill in

Why Eva scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eva
3.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
13.6% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$875 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eva
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eva
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eva
3.4

How Eva compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Eva risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 005601Eva: 1.71.7Evaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Eva

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 4.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Eva, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Morgan County average of 4.1 and in line with the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 46th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 01103005601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01103005601?

Census tract 01103005601 in Eva scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01103005601?

Median gross rent is $875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01103005601?

13.6% of residents in tract 01103005601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,515.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01103005601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 76th, minority 17th, housing 25th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 01103005601 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 01103005601 compare to Eva overall?

Tract 01103005601 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Eva at 1.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eva; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Eva

Top eight tracts in Eva ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related