Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Eva Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 01103005601 · Morgan County, AL · pop 3,515 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Eva
Census tract 01103005601 covers part of Eva, AL, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,515 residents. The severe-burden share is 37%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,190
Renter share17.7%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate13.6%
Median income$64,423
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
37
th percentile
Low
National
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Eva and the region
Centroid at 34.3614, -86.6584 · click any tract to drill in
Why Eva scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Eva
3.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.5
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
13.6% poverty · this tract
3.4
Supply constraint
$875 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eva
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eva
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eva
3.4
How Eva compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 46
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 54%Socioeconomic
- 76%Household composition
- 17%Racial/ethnic minority
- 25%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.4%Housing insecurity
- 7.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.7%Food insecurity
- 10.0%SNAP enrollment
- 7.8%Transit barriers
- 9.2%No health insurance
- 16.8%Frequent mental distress
- 37.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Eva
Cost burden runs 50% here against 32.5% across Morgan County. Average gross rent is $875, 38% above the Eva average.
The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 1.5/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.
Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.2/10. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 18% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $64,423, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Morgan County average of 3.5 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 01103005601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01103005601?
Census tract 01103005601 in Eva scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 01103005601?
Median gross rent is $875/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 01103005601?
13.6% of residents in tract 01103005601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,515.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 01103005601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 54th, household 76th, minority 17th, housing 25th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 01103005601 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 01103005601 compare to Eva overall?
Tract 01103005601 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Eva at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eva; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Eva
Top eight tracts in Eva ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related