Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Golden Shores Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 04015952005 · Mohave, AZ · pop 865 · 42% of tract blocks fall in Golden Shores
With a score of 3/10, tract 04015952005 in Golden Shores, AZ reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 865. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units819
Renter share51.9%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$60,240
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
20
th percentile
Low
Within state
40
th percentile
Low
National
20
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Golden Shores and the region
Centroid at 34.8458, -114.4801 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Shores scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Golden Shores
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Shores
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Shores
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Shores
5.0
How Golden Shores compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 21%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.2%Housing insecurity
- 5.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.5%Food insecurity
- 8.3%SNAP enrollment
- 6.2%Transit barriers
- 9.6%No health insurance
- 13.5%Frequent mental distress
- 36.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Golden Shores
Cost burden runs roughly one in two here against 40.0% across Mohave County. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 2.2/10. The severe-burden share is 8%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. It sits 0.7 points below the Mohave County average of 3.7.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 04015952005
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04015952005?
Census tract 04015952005 in Golden Shores scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 04015952005?
3.9% of residents in tract 04015952005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 865.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 04015952005?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 20th, minority 21th, housing 59th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 04015952005 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 04015952005 compare to Golden Shores overall?
Tract 04015952005 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Golden Shores at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Shores; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Shores
Top eight tracts in Golden Shores ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related