Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally
Drysdale Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 04027011000 · Yuma, AZ · pop 1,676 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Drysdale
Census tract 04027011000 covers part of Drysdale, AZ, and scores 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 1,676 residents. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units571
Renter share20.5%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate20.1%
Median income$52,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
76
th percentile
High
Within state
71
th percentile
Elevated
National
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Drysdale and the region
Centroid at 32.6737, -114.7160 · click any tract to drill in
Why Drysdale scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Drysdale
5.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.7
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
20.1% poverty · this tract
5.0
Supply constraint
$827 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Drysdale
1.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Drysdale
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Drysdale
2.1
How Drysdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 77%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 77%Racial/ethnic minority
- 52%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.7%Housing insecurity
- 10.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 24.0%Food insecurity
- 18.5%SNAP enrollment
- 11.1%Transit barriers
- 21.6%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 39.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Drysdale
The clearest offset is tenant-organizing strength at 1/10. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10.
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.2/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.6% against 11.3% nationally.
The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Against the Yuma County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.6 points.
Nationally it ranks #42,813 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 7.8/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 44% of renters. Average gross rent is $827, close to the Drysdale average.
Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $52,250.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 04027011000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04027011000?
Census tract 04027011000 in Drysdale scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04027011000?
Median gross rent is $827/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04027011000?
20.1% of residents in tract 04027011000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,676.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04027011000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 71th, minority 77th, housing 52th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 04027011000 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 04027011000 compare to Drysdale overall?
Tract 04027011000 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Drysdale at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Drysdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related