Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Lost Bridge Village Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 05007021405 ·
Benton County, AR · pop 2,272 · 18% of tract blocks fall in Lost Bridge Village
05007021405 is a census tract in Lost Bridge Village, AR. It scores 3.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,272. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 7%Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units925
Renter share8.5%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$74,489
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Lost Bridge Village
Moderate
Within county
46th percentile
#31 of 57 tracts In Benton County
Moderate
Within state
43th percentile
#474 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
Moderate
National
25th percentile
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lost Bridge Village and the region
Centroid at 36.3909, -93.9338 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lost Bridge Village scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lost Bridge Village
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,019 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lost Bridge Village
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lost Bridge Village
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lost Bridge Village
1.1
How Lost Bridge Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.2%Housing insecurity
5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
10.3%Food insecurity
5.5%SNAP enrollment
5.8%Transit barriers
8.1%No health insurance
14.6%Frequent mental distress
34.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lost Bridge Village
Running cool, housing-court posture reads 1.1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Against Benton County at 30.1%, 22% of renters here are cost-burdened.
SNAP participation runs 5.5% against 15.2% nationally. 9% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Food insecurity runs 10.3% against 17.8% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 9% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 3.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $74,489, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 05007021405
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05007021405?
Census tract 05007021405 in Lost Bridge Village scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 05007021405?
Median gross rent is $1,019/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 22% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 05007021405?
4.8% of residents in tract 05007021405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,272.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 05007021405?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 15th, minority 27th, housing 22th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 05007021405 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 05007021405 compare to Lost Bridge Village overall?
Tract 05007021405 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Lost Bridge Village at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lost Bridge Village; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.