Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,273 of 84,120 nationally

Siloam Springs Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 05007021201 · Benton County, AR · pop 5,035 · 91% of tract blocks fall in Siloam Springs

With a score of 3.7/10, tract 05007021201 in Siloam Springs, AR reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 49% here against 30.1% across Benton County.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 23% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,636
Renter share44.1%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$79,408

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Siloam Springs
Very Low
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 57 tracts In Benton County
Elevated
Within state
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#356 of 823 tracts In Arkansas
Elevated
National
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#54,273 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Siloam Springs and the region

Centroid at 36.1978, -94.5570 · click any tract to drill in

Why Siloam Springs scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$911 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Siloam Springs
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Siloam Springs
5.5

How Siloam Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Siloam Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.7This tracttract 0212013.8Siloam Springsparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 46

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Siloam Springs

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.1/10. Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Average gross rent is $911, 9% below the Siloam Springs average. That is riskier than roughly 35% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 5.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Against average income of $79,408, annual rent is just 14%.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the Benton County average of 3.6 closely.

44% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 05007021201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05007021201?

Census tract 05007021201 in Siloam Springs scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 05007021201?

Median gross rent is $911/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 05007021201?

4.3% of residents in tract 05007021201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,035.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 05007021201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 30th, minority 59th, housing 51th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 05007021201 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 05007021201 compare to Siloam Springs overall?

Tract 05007021201 scores 3.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Siloam Springs at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Siloam Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Siloam Springs

Top eight tracts in Siloam Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related