Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #10,320 of 84,120 nationally

Gold Coast Eviction Risk: Elevated , Alameda

Tract 06001427300 · Alameda, CA · pop 5,283 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 7.5/10, tract 06001427300 in the Gold Coast area of Alameda, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,283. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10.

Risk score
7.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 31% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units2,112
Renter share48.8%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate11.6%
Median income$136,681

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Gold Coast
Very High
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 16 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#205 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Moderate
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#4,386 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alameda and the region

Centroid at 37.7810, -122.2663 · click any tract to drill in

Why Gold Coast scores 7.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alameda
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.6% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,915 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alameda
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alameda
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alameda
4.5

How Gold Coast compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Gold Coast risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.57.5This tracttract 427300Alameda: 7.87.8Alamedaparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 49

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Gold Coast. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Gold Coast

Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. 37% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Alameda County average of 45.5%. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.1/10.

At $1,915 a month, rents run 23% under what the rest of Alameda commands. Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 10.4% against 17.8% nationally.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #10,320 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10.

Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $136,681, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Alameda County average of 7.8 closely.

49% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001427300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001427300?

Census tract 06001427300 in the Gold Coast neighborhood scores 7.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001427300?

Median gross rent is $1,915/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001427300?

11.6% of residents in tract 06001427300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,283.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001427300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 24th, household 51th, minority 78th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 06001427300 considered part of Gold Coast?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001427300 fall within Gold Coast (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001427300 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001427300 compare to Alameda overall?

Tract 06001427300 scores 7.5/10, lower than the parent city of Alameda at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alameda; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001427300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 31% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Alameda

Top eight tracts in Alameda ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related