Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Piedmont Avenue Eviction Risk: Moderate , Oakland

Tract 06001426200 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,861 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

06001426200 is a census tract in the Piedmont Avenue area of Piedmont, CA. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,861 residents. Cost burden runs 13% here against 45.5% across Alameda County.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 14% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,644
Renter share15.6%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Piedmont Avenue
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Oakland
Very High
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#377 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Very Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#8,542 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.8246, -122.2406 · click any tract to drill in

Why Piedmont Avenue scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Oakland
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Oakland
1.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Oakland
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Oakland
2.2

How Piedmont Avenue compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Piedmont Avenue risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 426200Oakland: 9.69.6Oaklandparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Piedmont Avenue. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Piedmont Avenue

Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.7 points. The voucher gap is 30.5%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.6/10. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.8/10.

On the high side, regional political climate reads 8.1/10. Food insecurity runs 5.6% against 17.8% nationally.

9% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Oakland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001426200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001426200?

Census tract 06001426200 in the Piedmont Avenue neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001426200?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001426200?

6.5% of residents in tract 06001426200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,861.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001426200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 56th, minority 49th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 06001426200 considered part of Piedmont Avenue?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001426200 fall within Piedmont Avenue (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001426200 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001426200 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001426200 scores 5.1/10, lower than the parent city of Oakland at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001426200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related