Tract 06029003305 ·
Kern, CA · pop 3,448 · 77% of tract blocks fall in Frazier Park
Frazier Park is where census tract 06029003305 sits, home to 3,448 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 7.1/10. It lands near the 96th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,293 monthly, set against $40,949 in average yearly household income, roughly 38% of income at the averages. Renters make up 36% of occupied homes.
Risk score
8.2
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17%Stable renters 19%Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,492
Renter share36.1%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate26.7%
Median income$40,949
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Frazier Park
Moderate
Within county
81th percentile
#46 of 236 tracts In Kern
High
Within state
93th percentile
#676 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
National
98th percentile
#1,608 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Frazier Park and the region
Centroid at 34.8025, -118.9628 · click any tract to drill in
Why Frazier Park scores 8.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Frazier Park
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
26.7% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,293 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Frazier Park
9.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Frazier Park
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Frazier Park
9.2
How Frazier Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
16.6%Housing insecurity
10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
21.8%Food insecurity
25.3%SNAP enrollment
11.7%Transit barriers
10.4%No health insurance
20.3%Frequent mental distress
39.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Frazier Park
The score leans hardest on housing court bias at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Frazier Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Kern County average of 6.1 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 16.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06029003305
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06029003305?
Census tract 06029003305 in Frazier Park scores 8.2/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06029003305?
Median gross rent is $1,293/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06029003305?
26.7% of residents in tract 06029003305 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,448.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06029003305?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 83th, minority 33th, housing 47th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06029003305 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06029003305 compare to Frazier Park overall?
Tract 06029003305 scores 8.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Frazier Park at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Frazier Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.