Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
24.8%Housing insecurity
11.9%Utility-shutoff threat
30.2%Food insecurity
25.7%SNAP enrollment
14.5%Transit barriers
21.6%No health insurance
20.0%Frequent mental distress
37.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Greenfield
The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.3/10. 70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Running cool, economic stress reads 2/10.
Food insecurity runs 30.2% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 24.8% against 14.2% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 06029003214
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06029003214?
Census tract 06029003214 in Greenfield scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 06029003214?
7.8% of residents in tract 06029003214 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,498.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 06029003214?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 95th, minority 90th, housing 30th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 06029003214 struggle to pay rent?
About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 06029003214 compare to Greenfield overall?
Tract 06029003214 scores 6/10, lower than the parent city of Greenfield at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greenfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.