Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #4,396 of 84,120 nationally

Kelseyville Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06033001000 · Lake, CA · pop 6,891 · 31% of tract blocks fall in Kelseyville

Census tract 06033001000 covers Kelseyville, home to 6,891 residents. For landlords it grades 6.6/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 89% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,194 a month against an average household income of $57,229 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 20% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,446
Renter share40.9%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate16.6%
Median income$57,229

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Kelseyville
Moderate
Within county
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 21 tracts In Lake
Elevated
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#1,980 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
National
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#4,396 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kelseyville and the region

Centroid at 38.9776, -122.8896 · click any tract to drill in

Why Kelseyville scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kelseyville
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
16.6% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$1,194 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kelseyville
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kelseyville
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kelseyville
7.1

How Kelseyville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Kelseyville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.17.1This tracttract 001000Kelseyville: 8.28.2Kelseyvilleparent cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 90

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 47Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 1.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.0%Peak (2011)
  • 15Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 060330010002011: 17 filings (2.00/100 renter HHs)2012: 15 filings (1.76/100 renter HHs)2014: 15 filings (1.76/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Kelseyville

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Kelseyville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lake County average of 6.4 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 90th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 47 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 1.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.0% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06033001000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06033001000?

Census tract 06033001000 in Kelseyville scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06033001000?

Median gross rent is $1,194/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06033001000?

16.6% of residents in tract 06033001000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,891.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06033001000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 87th, minority 66th, housing 71th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06033001000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 47 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 06033001000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.84% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 06033001000 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06033001000 compare to Kelseyville overall?

Tract 06033001000 scores 7.1/10, lower than the parent city of Kelseyville at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kelseyville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related