Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #3,427 of 84,120 nationally
Lower Lake Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06033001200 · Lake, CA · pop 3,345 · 22% of tract blocks fall in Lower Lake
With a score of 6.8/10, tract 06033001200 in Lower Lake ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,345 residents. On the national scale it ranks #6,329 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,078 a month against an average household income of $62,173 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units1,407
Renter share23.9%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$62,173
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
65
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
83
th percentile
High
National
96
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lower Lake and the region
Centroid at 38.8478, -122.4649 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lower Lake scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lower Lake
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,078 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lower Lake
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lower Lake
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lower Lake
9.2
How Lower Lake compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 73
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 62%Socioeconomic
- 90%Household composition
- 56%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 51Total filings over 3 yrs
- 5.61%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.3%Peak (2012)
- 13Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.4%Food insecurity
- 14.6%SNAP enrollment
- 8.2%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 34.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lower Lake
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lower Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Lake County average of 6.4 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06033001200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06033001200?
Census tract 06033001200 in Lower Lake scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06033001200?
Median gross rent is $1,078/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06033001200?
15.2% of residents in tract 06033001200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,345.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06033001200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 90th, minority 56th, housing 59th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06033001200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 51 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 06033001200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.61% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 06033001200 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06033001200 compare to Lower Lake overall?
Tract 06033001200 scores 7.4/10, lower than the parent city of Lower Lake at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lower Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related