Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #162 of 84,120 nationally
Cudahy Eviction Risk: High
Tract 06037534301 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,104
Cudahy is where census tract 06037534301 sits, home to 4,104 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 7.1/10. That is riskier than roughly 96% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,636 monthly, set against $44,792 in average yearly household income, roughly 44% of income at the averages. Renters make up 93% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
9.3
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 62%
Stable renters 30%
Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,078
Renter share92.6%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate36.2%
Median income$44,792
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
97
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
National
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cudahy and the region
Centroid at 33.9600, -118.1853 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cudahy scores 9.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cudahy
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
36.2% poverty · this tract
9.0
Supply constraint
$1,636 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cudahy
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cudahy
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cudahy
8.7
How Cudahy compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 98
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 38.4%Housing insecurity
- 18.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 50.1%Food insecurity
- 47.9%SNAP enrollment
- 23.5%Transit barriers
- 31.1%No health insurance
- 21.8%Frequent mental distress
- 46.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cudahy
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cudahy, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 38.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 18.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037534301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037534301?
Census tract 06037534301 in Cudahy scores 9.3/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037534301?
Median gross rent is $1,636/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037534301?
36.2% of residents in tract 06037534301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,104.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037534301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 85th, minority 96th, housing 92th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06037534301 struggle to pay rent?
About 38.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06037534301 compare to Cudahy overall?
Tract 06037534301 scores 9.3/10, higher than the parent city of Cudahy at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cudahy; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 06037534301 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cudahy
Top eight tracts in Cudahy ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related