Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #550 of 84,120 nationally

Cudahy Eviction Risk: High

Tract 06037534302 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,861

The Elevated-tier score of 6.9/10 for census tract 06037534302 reflects conditions in Cudahy, California. That is riskier than about 94% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 61% of renter households, a severe level, and 34% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,830 a month against an average household income of $62,500 a year, roughly 35% of income at the averages. About 92% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 56% Stable renters 35% Owners 9%
Tract context
Occupied units916
Renter share91.8%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate28.9%
Median income$62,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Cudahy
Elevated
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#197 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#186 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
National
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#550 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cudahy and the region

Centroid at 33.9586, -118.1741 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cudahy scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cudahy
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
28.9% poverty · this tract
7.2
Supply constraint
$1,830 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cudahy
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cudahy
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cudahy
8.7

How Cudahy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cudahy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.98.9This tracttract 534302Cudahy: 8.68.6Cudahyparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cudahy

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cudahy, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 35.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 16.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037534302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037534302?

Census tract 06037534302 in Cudahy scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037534302?

Median gross rent is $1,830/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037534302?

28.9% of residents in tract 06037534302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,861.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037534302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 68th, minority 99th, housing 74th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06037534302 struggle to pay rent?

About 35.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 16.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06037534302 compare to Cudahy overall?

Tract 06037534302 scores 8.9/10, higher than the parent city of Cudahy at 8.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cudahy; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cudahy

Top eight tracts in Cudahy ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related