Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037576401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,338 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

06037576401 is a census tract in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,338 residents. Severe burden reaches 36%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 43% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,289
Renter share92.0%
SVI overall0.95
Poverty rate27.9%
Median income$63,015

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
High
Within parent city
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#39 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Elevated
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#702 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7790, -118.1785 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
27.9% poverty · this tract
7.0
Supply constraint
$1,647 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 576401Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 95

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.

Food insecurity runs 38.3% against 17.8% nationally. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.

Housing insecurity runs 30.3% against 14.2% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.5/10. The poverty rate is 28%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. Average gross rent is $1,647, 12% below the Long Beach average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. 54% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037576401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037576401?

Census tract 06037576401 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037576401?

Median gross rent is $1,647/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037576401?

27.9% of residents in tract 06037576401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,338.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037576401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 95th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 91th, minority 92th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 06037576401 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037576401 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037576401 struggle to pay rent?

About 30.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037576401 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037576401 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037576401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related