Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037191810 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,807 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 06037191810 sits in the Larchmont area of Los Angeles eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Population here is 2,807. 36% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score

9.9

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 59% Stable renters 38% Owners 3%

Tract context

Occupied units1,237

Renter share97.2%

SVI overall0.79

Poverty rate10.4%

Median income$67,321

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0889, -118.3277 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

10.4% poverty · this tract

2.6

Supply constraint

$1,938 rent vs county FMR

2.4

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

96%Socioeconomic
13%Household composition
87%Racial/ethnic minority
66%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
15%Grade C
30%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

19.3%Housing insecurity
8.5%Utility-shutoff threat
22.1%Food insecurity
19.4%SNAP enrollment
11.3%Transit barriers
13.1%No health insurance
17.9%Frequent mental distress
30.0%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larchmont

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. This is renter territory: 97% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Annualized rent equals 35% of average household income of $67,321, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

Cost burden runs 61% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,938, close to the Los Angeles average.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037191810

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037191810?

Census tract 06037191810 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037191810?

Median gross rent is $1,938/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037191810?

10.4% of residents in tract 06037191810 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,807.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037191810?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 13th, minority 87th, housing 66th.

Is tract 06037191810 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037191810 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037191810 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037191810 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037191810 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037191810 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 30% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.