Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #550 of 84,120 nationally

Omaha Heights Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037201401 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,632 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06037201401 (Omaha Heights in Los Angeles, California) comes in at 7.4/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 98th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 68% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,639 a month while the average household earns $55,313 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 56% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
8.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 18% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units1,321
Renter share56.2%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate28.4%
Median income$55,313

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Omaha Heights
Moderate
Within parent city
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#156 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#184 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#186 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0783, -118.1858 · click any tract to drill in

Why Omaha Heights scores 8.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
28.4% poverty · this tract
7.1
Supply constraint
$1,639 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Omaha Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Omaha Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.98.9This tracttract 201401Los Angeles: 9.99.9Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Omaha Heights

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 27.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037201401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037201401?

Census tract 06037201401 in the Omaha Heights neighborhood scores 8.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037201401?

Median gross rent is $1,639/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037201401?

28.4% of residents in tract 06037201401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,632.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037201401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 81th, minority 92th, housing 79th.
Q5

Is tract 06037201401 considered part of Omaha Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037201401 fall within Omaha Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037201401 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037201401 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037201401 scores 8.9/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037201401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related