Census Tract · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 06037460502 Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06037460502 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,771

The Moderate-tier score of 4.6/10 for census tract 06037460502 reflects conditions in Los Angeles in Los Angeles County, California. It lands near the 27th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 13% of renter households, a modest level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,501 a month while the average household earns $250,001 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 8% of occupied homes.

Risk score

4.1

Moderate

Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 7% Owners 92%

Tract context

Occupied units1,476

Renter share8.3%

SVI overall0.11

Poverty rate2.0%

Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.2062, -118.1950 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 06037460502 scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

State baseline

6.8

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

2.0% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$3,501 rent vs county FMR

8.3

Rent control risk

State baseline

6.8

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

5.0

Tenant organizing strength

State baseline

4.0

Housing court bias

State baseline

5.0

How Tract 06037460502 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 11

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

6%Socioeconomic
27%Household composition
65%Racial/ethnic minority
14%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
89%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

5.1%Housing insecurity
2.3%Utility-shutoff threat
5.6%Food insecurity
3.8%SNAP enrollment
3.5%Transit barriers
2.6%No health insurance
11.1%Frequent mental distress
19.4%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 06037460502

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by California eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037460502

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037460502?

Census tract 06037460502 in Los Angeles scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037460502?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 13% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037460502?

2.0% of residents in tract 06037460502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,771.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037460502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 27th, minority 65th, housing 14th.

What share of households in tract 06037460502 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Was tract 06037460502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.