Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach
Tract 06037573300 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,856 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Tract 06037573300 sits in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. Population here is 3,856. The severe-burden share is 38%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Long Beach and the region
Centroid at 33.7933, -118.1757 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cambodia Town scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cambodia Town compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 85%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 75%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 100%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 30.8%Housing insecurity
- 16.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 44.1%Food insecurity
- 44.2%SNAP enrollment
- 20.8%Transit barriers
- 18.0%No health insurance
- 21.0%Frequent mental distress
- 42.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town
Food insecurity runs 44.1% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 44.2% against 15.2% nationally. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.
Annualized rent equals 39% of average household income of $51,467, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.
76% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 31%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10.
It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4. At $1,663 a month, rents run 11% under what the rest of Long Beach commands.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037573300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037573300?
What is the average rent in tract 06037573300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037573300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037573300?
Is tract 06037573300 considered part of Cambodia Town?
What share of households in tract 06037573300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037573300 compare to Long Beach overall?
Was tract 06037573300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach
Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.