Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach

Tract 06037576503 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,927 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 06037576503 sits in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. It is home to 3,927 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 52% Stable renters 33% Owners 15%
Tract context
Occupied units1,627
Renter share84.5%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$66,891

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 32 tracts In Cambodia Town
Elevated
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#42 of 112 tracts In Long Beach
Elevated
Within county
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#706 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Long Beach and the region

Centroid at 33.7718, -118.1697 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cambodia Town scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,743 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Long Beach
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Long Beach
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Long Beach
8.5

How Cambodia Town compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cambodia Town risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 576503Long Beach: 9.19.1Long Beachparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town

This is renter territory: 85% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Severe burden reaches 22%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running hot, local political climate reads 8.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.

61% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 8.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $1,743, close to the Long Beach average. Annual rent works out to 31% of average household income of $66,891.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037576503

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037576503?

Census tract 06037576503 in the Cambodia Town neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037576503?

Median gross rent is $1,743/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037576503?

15.6% of residents in tract 06037576503 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,927.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037576503?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 27th, minority 78th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 06037576503 considered part of Cambodia Town?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037576503 fall within Cambodia Town (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037576503 struggle to pay rent?

About 19.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037576503 compare to Long Beach overall?

Tract 06037576503 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Long Beach at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Long Beach eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037576503 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach

Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related