Cambodia Town Eviction Risk: High , Long Beach
Tract 06037576801 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,734 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037576801 in the Cambodia Town area of Long Beach, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,734 residents. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 9/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Long Beach and the region
Centroid at 33.7716, -118.1643 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cambodia Town scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Cambodia Town compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 64%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 71%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 28%Grade B
- 72%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Cambodia Town. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.4%Housing insecurity
- 6.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.0%Food insecurity
- 13.9%SNAP enrollment
- 8.5%Transit barriers
- 7.7%No health insurance
- 16.8%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Cambodia Town
82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 8.5/10.
Severe burden reaches 18%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points.
The poverty rate is 21%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Cost burden runs 48% here against 53.8% across Los Angeles County. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037576801
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037576801?
What is the average rent in tract 06037576801?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037576801?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037576801?
Is tract 06037576801 considered part of Cambodia Town?
What share of households in tract 06037576801 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037576801 compare to Long Beach overall?
Was tract 06037576801 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Long Beach
Top eight tracts in Long Beach ranked by composite eviction-risk score.