Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Superior Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Costa Mesa

Tract 06059063500 · Orange, CA · pop 6,542 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

In Superior Heights in Costa Mesa, census tract 06059063500 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 76% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,501 a month against an average household income of $137,809 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 56% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 30% Owners 44%
Tract context
Occupied units2,711
Renter share56.4%
SVI overall0.27
Poverty rate18.0%
Median income$137,809

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Superior Heights
Very Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 21 tracts In Costa Mesa
Very High
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#331 of 613 tracts In Orange
Moderate
Within state
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6,499 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Costa Mesa and the region

Centroid at 33.6172, -117.9357 · click any tract to drill in

Why Superior Heights scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Costa Mesa
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
18.0% poverty · this tract
4.5
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
7.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Costa Mesa
6.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Costa Mesa
8.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Costa Mesa
5.3

How Superior Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Superior Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 063500Costa Mesa: 7.77.7Costa Mesaparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 27

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Superior Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Superior Heights

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 8.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Costa Mesa, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 27th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059063500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059063500?

Census tract 06059063500 in the Superior Heights neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059063500?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059063500?

18.0% of residents in tract 06059063500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,542.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059063500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 27th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 15th, minority 36th, housing 52th.
Q5

Is tract 06059063500 considered part of Superior Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059063500 fall within Superior Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059063500 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059063500 compare to Costa Mesa overall?

Tract 06059063500 scores 4.4/10, lower than the parent city of Costa Mesa at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Costa Mesa; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Costa Mesa

Top eight tracts in Costa Mesa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related