Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #20,889 of 84,120 nationally

Superior Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Costa Mesa

Tract 06059063604 · Orange, CA · pop 3,811 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

In Superior Heights in Costa Mesa, census tract 06059063604 scores 5.5/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,140 a month against an average household income of $72,273 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 69% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 39% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,618
Renter share69.0%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$72,273

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Superior Heights
Very High
Within parent city
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#3 of 24 tracts In Costa Mesa
Very High
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#188 of 613 tracts In Orange
Elevated
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#5,035 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Costa Mesa and the region

Centroid at 33.6383, -117.9374 · click any tract to drill in

Why Superior Heights scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Costa Mesa
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$2,140 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Costa Mesa
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Costa Mesa
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Costa Mesa
5.9

How Superior Heights compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Superior Heights risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.35.3This tracttract 063604Costa Mesa: 7.77.7Costa Mesaparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Superior Heights. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Superior Heights

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Costa Mesa, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Orange County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 94th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06059063604

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06059063604?

Census tract 06059063604 in the Superior Heights neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06059063604?

Median gross rent is $2,140/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06059063604?

6.2% of residents in tract 06059063604 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,811.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06059063604?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 78th, minority 71th, housing 100th.
Q5

Is tract 06059063604 considered part of Superior Heights?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06059063604 fall within Superior Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06059063604 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06059063604 compare to Costa Mesa overall?

Tract 06059063604 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Costa Mesa at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Costa Mesa; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Costa Mesa

Top eight tracts in Costa Mesa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related