Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #5,690 of 84,120 nationally

Desert Hot Springs Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06065044507 · Riverside, CA · pop 7,212 · 63% of tract blocks fall in Desert Hot Springs

For landlords sizing up Desert Hot Springs in Riverside County, census tract 06065044507 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.2/10. It lands near the 81st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,421 monthly, set against $63,249 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 40% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 26% Owners 60%
Tract context
Occupied units2,450
Renter share40.4%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate14.5%
Median income$63,249

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 7 tracts In Desert Hot Springs
Low
Within county
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#62 of 518 tracts In Riverside
High
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#2,402 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#5,690 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Desert Hot Springs and the region

Centroid at 33.9473, -116.5282 · click any tract to drill in

Why Desert Hot Springs scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
14.5% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,421 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Desert Hot Springs
8.4

How Desert Hot Springs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Desert Hot Springs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.86.8This tracttract 044507Desert Hot Springs: 8.28.2Desert Hot Springsparent cityCounty: 5.15.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Desert Hot Springs

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Desert Hot Springs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Riverside County average of 6.2 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06065044507

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065044507?

Census tract 06065044507 in Desert Hot Springs scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06065044507?

Median gross rent is $1,421/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06065044507?

14.5% of residents in tract 06065044507 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,212.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06065044507?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 97th, household 90th, minority 88th, housing 92th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06065044507 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06065044507 compare to Desert Hot Springs overall?

Tract 06065044507 scores 6.8/10, lower than the parent city of Desert Hot Springs at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Desert Hot Springs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Desert Hot Springs

Top eight tracts in Desert Hot Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related