Tract 06065042903 ·
Riverside, CA · pop 5,593 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Good Hope
Tract 06065042903 sits in Good Hope, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 8.5/10. Population here is 5,593. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.
Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%Stable renters 13%Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,301
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$62,891
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Good Hope
Very Low
Within county
98th percentile
#11 of 518 tracts In Riverside
Very High
Within state
72th percentile
#2,547 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
National
94th percentile
#5,413 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Good Hope and the region
Centroid at 33.8028, -117.3133 · click any tract to drill in
Why Good Hope scores 8.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Good Hope
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,511 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Good Hope
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Good Hope
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Good Hope
8.9
How Good Hope compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
29.3%Housing insecurity
14.4%Utility-shutoff threat
37.0%Food insecurity
32.3%SNAP enrollment
17.3%Transit barriers
24.2%No health insurance
20.3%Frequent mental distress
44.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Good Hope
On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.9/10. It sits 1.9 points above the Riverside County average of 6.6.
Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.8/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 24.2% against 11.3% nationally.
Disability prevalence runs 44.3% against 31.5% nationally. The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Nationally it ranks #5,413 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Rent takes 30% or more of income for 55% of renters. Average gross rent is $1,511, close to the Good Hope average.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065042903
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065042903?
Census tract 06065042903 in Good Hope scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065042903?
Median gross rent is $1,511/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065042903?
15.0% of residents in tract 06065042903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,593.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065042903?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 61th, minority 89th, housing 87th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065042903 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065042903 compare to Good Hope overall?
Tract 06065042903 scores 8.5/10, higher than the parent city of Good Hope at 7.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Good Hope; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Good Hope
Top eight tracts in Good Hope ranked by composite eviction-risk score.