Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #6,289 of 84,120 nationally
Good Hope Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06065042903 · Riverside, CA · pop 5,593 · 55% of tract blocks fall in Good Hope
Tract 06065042903, home to 5,593 residents in Good Hope in Riverside County, scores 6.7/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 91% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,511 a month against an average household income of $62,891 a year, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.
Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units1,301
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$62,891
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
85
th percentile
High
Within state
72
th percentile
Elevated
National
93
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Good Hope and the region
Centroid at 33.8028, -117.3133 · click any tract to drill in
Why Good Hope scores 6.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Good Hope
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,511 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Good Hope
8.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Good Hope
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Good Hope
8.9
How Good Hope compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 87%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 29.3%Housing insecurity
- 14.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 37.0%Food insecurity
- 32.3%SNAP enrollment
- 17.3%Transit barriers
- 24.2%No health insurance
- 20.3%Frequent mental distress
- 44.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Good Hope
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Good Hope, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Riverside County average of 6.2 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 89th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 29.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06065042903
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06065042903?
Census tract 06065042903 in Good Hope scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06065042903?
Median gross rent is $1,511/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06065042903?
15.0% of residents in tract 06065042903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,593.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06065042903?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 61th, minority 89th, housing 87th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06065042903 struggle to pay rent?
About 29.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06065042903 compare to Good Hope overall?
Tract 06065042903 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Good Hope at 8.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Good Hope; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Good Hope
Top eight tracts in Good Hope ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related