Little Hollywood Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco
Tract 06075061000 · San Francisco, CA · pop 4,890 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 9.1/10, tract 06075061000 in the Little Hollywood area of San Francisco, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,890. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Francisco and the region
Centroid at 37.7132, -122.3847 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Hollywood scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 70
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 7%Grade C
- 14%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Hollywood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.2%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.7%Food insecurity
- 11.6%SNAP enrollment
- 7.8%Transit barriers
- 7.3%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 24.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Hollywood
Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #3,797 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 7.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for around a third of renters.
It tracks the San Francisco County average of 9.5 closely. Average gross rent is $2,425, close to the San Francisco average. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $125,327.
28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06075061000
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075061000?
What is the average rent in tract 06075061000?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06075061000?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06075061000?
Is tract 06075061000 considered part of Little Hollywood?
What share of households in tract 06075061000 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06075061000 compare to San Francisco overall?
Was tract 06075061000 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco
Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.