Saint James Square Historic District Eviction Risk: High , San Jose
Tract 06085501000 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 5,003 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06085501000 in the Saint James Square Historic District area of San Jose, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.5/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across San Jose and the region
Centroid at 37.3416, -121.8881 · click any tract to drill in
Why Saint James Square Historic District scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Saint James Square Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 96%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 39%Grade C
- 24%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.1%Food insecurity
- 19.9%SNAP enrollment
- 12.2%Transit barriers
- 14.6%No health insurance
- 18.3%Frequent mental distress
- 33.1%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Saint James Square Historic District
92% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9/10. Average gross rent is $1,769, 34% below the San Jose average.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. Against the Santa Clara County average of 8.0, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points. Annualized rent equals 34% of average household income of $63,291, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with.
The severe-burden share is 19%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.9/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 45% of renters.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06085501000
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085501000?
What is the average rent in tract 06085501000?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06085501000?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06085501000?
Is tract 06085501000 considered part of Saint James Square Historic District?
What share of households in tract 06085501000 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06085501000 compare to San Jose overall?
Was tract 06085501000 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in San Jose
Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.