Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #6,848 of 84,120 nationally

Notting Hill - Royal Crest Eviction Risk: Elevated , San Jose

Tract 06085503709 · Santa Clara, CA · pop 6,178 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 06085503709, home to 6,178 residents in the Notting Hill - Royal Crest area of San Jose, scores 6.5/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

52% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,383 a month against an average household income of $66,420 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 69% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 33% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units2,167
Renter share68.9%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate22.8%
Median income$66,420

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 tracts In Notting Hill - Royal Crest
Very High
Within parent city
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 216 tracts In San Jose
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 408 tracts In Santa Clara
Very High
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,728 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Jose and the region

Centroid at 37.3645, -121.8620 · click any tract to drill in

Why Notting Hill - Royal Crest scores 6.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.4
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
22.8% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,383 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Jose
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Jose
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Jose
8.5

How Notting Hill - Royal Crest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Notting Hill - Royal Crest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.66.6This tracttract 503709San Jose: 9.29.2San Joseparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Notting Hill - Royal Crest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Notting Hill - Royal Crest

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from San Jose eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Santa Clara County average of 5.4 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 98th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06085503709

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06085503709?

Census tract 06085503709 in the Notting Hill - Royal Crest neighborhood scores 6.6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06085503709?

Median gross rent is $1,383/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06085503709?

22.8% of residents in tract 06085503709 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,178.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06085503709?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 94th, minority 95th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 06085503709 considered part of Notting Hill - Royal Crest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06085503709 fall within Notting Hill - Royal Crest (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06085503709 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06085503709 compare to San Jose overall?

Tract 06085503709 scores 6.6/10, lower than the parent city of San Jose at 9.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Jose eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Jose

Top eight tracts in San Jose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related