Census Tract · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Ramah Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 08041003910 ·
El Paso County, CO · pop 2,340 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Ramah
How risky is Ramah for landlords? Census tract 08041003910 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 51% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 48% of renter households, a severe level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,632 a month while the average household earns $74,063 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%Stable renters 7%Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,002
Renter share12.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate8.0%
Median income$74,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Ramah
Moderate
Within county
44th percentile
#94 of 167 tracts In El Paso County
Moderate
Within state
40th percentile
#868 of 1,447 tracts In Colorado
Moderate
National
23th percentile
#65,113 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ramah and the region
Centroid at 39.0264, -104.2563 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ramah scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ramah
3.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Colorado legislature & governorship
4.7
Economic stress
8.0% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,632 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ramah
3.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ramah
1.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ramah
3.9
How Ramah compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 4.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Ramah, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the El Paso County average of 5.6 and below the Colorado statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 08041003910
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 08041003910?
Census tract 08041003910 in Ramah scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 08041003910?
Median gross rent is $1,632/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 08041003910?
8.0% of residents in tract 08041003910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,340.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 08041003910?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 35th, minority 23th, housing 17th.
Q5
How does tract 08041003910 compare to Ramah overall?
Tract 08041003910 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Ramah at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ramah; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.