Skip to content
Map of District of Columbia eviction risk by county

Fair Housing Protected Classes in District of Columbia 2026

Federal Fair Housing Act baseline plus District of Columbia-specific additions under D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act).

21 classes Total protected (7 federal + 14 state)
Statewide Source-of-income protection
14 additions Beyond federal baseline
$25,597 Federal first-offense max civil penalty (24 C.F.R. § 180.671)
Federal baseline (uniform in District of Columbia): The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604, prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex (incl. sexual orientation and gender identity per HUD 2021), familial status, and disability. These seven classes are enforceable in District of Columbia through HUD complaint regardless of what state law says.

Source of Income, Section 8 / HCV Status in District of Columbia

District of Columbia: Source of Income Is Protected Statewide.

District of Columbia is a source-of-income protected state. Landlords statewide must consider applicants paying with Section 8 vouchers, other federal/state housing subsidies, child support, social security, or any other lawful source of income.

All 21 Protected Classes in District of Columbia

Federal classes apply uniformly. The classes shaded green below are District of Columbia-specific additions under D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act).

Race (federal)
Color (federal)
Religion (federal)
National Origin (federal)
Sex (federal)
Familial Status (federal)
Disability (federal)
Source of Income (incl. vouchers)
Sexual Orientation
Gender Identity / Expression
Marital Status
Personal Appearance
Political Affiliation
Matriculation
Family Responsibilities
Place of Residence / Business
Victim of Intrafamily Offense
Age (18+)
Genetic Information
Credit Information (since 2017)
Domestic Partner Status

Recent District of Columbia Statutory Activity

Most expansive list in the U.S., 21+ protected traits.

If you own or manage a rental in Washington, D.C., start with this: a landlord cannot refuse an applicant simply because they pay with a Section 8 / Housing Choice Voucher. Source of income is a protected class here, so "no vouchers," "no Section 8," and "must show employment income only" are all off the table. This is the single rule that trips up the most small District landlords, because it differs sharply from many states where voucher discrimination is still legal.

The governing law is the D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act), enforced by the DC Office of Human Rights. The District goes far beyond the seven federal Fair Housing Act classes, recognizing source of income, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, personal appearance, political affiliation, and a long list of others. 21+ protected traits in all, the most expansive list in the country.

The Section 8 Rule: Source of Income Is Protected Statewide

Across the District, source of income is a protected class, meaning the lawful way a tenant funds the rent cannot be a basis for rejection. That explicitly includes Housing Choice Vouchers, so a landlord who advertises "no Section 8" or quietly screens out voucher holders is violating the D.C. Human Rights Act. The protection also reaches Social Security, disability benefits, child support, alimony, pensions, and other lawful income.

The practical trap: you may still apply consistent, income-neutral standards (rental history, references, ability to pay the tenant's share), but you cannot count the voucher itself against an applicant or impose a minimum-income test that effectively excludes voucher holders. Treat the voucher as guaranteed income and screen the rest of the file the same way you screen everyone else.

What D.C. Adds Beyond the Seven Federal Classes

Federal law protects race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. The District layers on far more. Beyond source of income, the D.C. Human Rights Act protects sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, personal appearance, political affiliation, matriculation, family responsibilities, place of residence or business, victim of an intrafamily offense, age (18+), genetic information, credit information (since 2017), and domestic partner status.

Several of these are unusual and easy to overlook. "Personal appearance" and "political affiliation" mean you cannot screen on a tenant's looks, dress, or party. "Family responsibilities" protects caregivers, "matriculation" protects students, and the 2017 credit-information class limits how heavily you can weigh a credit report. Together these make the District's list the broadest in the U.S.

Screening and Advertising Traps for Small Landlords

Most District violations are unintentional and live in the ad copy and the screening checklist. Phrases like "no Section 8," "professionals only," "perfect credit required," "no students," or "quiet single person preferred" each map onto a protected class, source of income, family responsibilities or credit information, matriculation, and marital/family status. Write the standard down, apply it identically to every applicant, and keep dated records of every approval and denial.

Because the District recognizes credit information and personal appearance as protected, blanket credit cutoffs and informal "gut feel" rejections are especially risky. The safest posture is objective, written criteria applied in the same order to every file, with the voucher amount treated as verified income rather than a red flag.

The Cost of a Fair-Housing Violation

Federal civil penalty (uniform in all states): Up to $25,597 for a first-offense FHA violation under 24 C.F.R. § 180.671 (HUD inflation-adjusted). Repeat offenders face up to $63,991 (within five years) or $127,982 (within seven years). HUD-conciliated settlements routinely include actual damages, attorney's fees, mandatory training, and required policy changes. District of Columbia's state fair-housing agency may pursue parallel penalties under D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act).

City-Level Eviction Risk in District of Columbia

Fair-housing complaint rates correlate with overall tenant-protection enforcement. View landlord risk and tenant-law profile by city:

Sources & Methodology

Related Guides for District of Columbia Landlords

This page summarizes fair housing protections under the D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act), enforced by the DC Office of Human Rights, alongside the federal Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3604). Last reviewed June 2026. It is provided for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice; consult a licensed attorney or the DC Office of Human Rights for guidance on a specific situation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a landlord refuse Section 8 in Washington, D.C.?

No. Source of income is a protected class under the D.C. Human Rights Act, so a landlord cannot reject an applicant or refuse to rent simply because they would pay with a Housing Choice Voucher. "No Section 8" advertising and voucher-based screening are both prohibited. You may still apply consistent, income-neutral standards, but the voucher itself cannot count against the applicant.

How many protected classes does the District of Columbia have?

More than any state. 21+ protected traits. On top of the seven federal Fair Housing Act classes, D.C. adds source of income, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, personal appearance, political affiliation, matriculation, family responsibilities, place of residence or business, victim of an intrafamily offense, age (18+), genetic information, credit information, and domestic partner status. It is the most expansive list in the U.S.

Are sexual orientation and gender identity protected in D.C. housing?

Yes. The D.C. Human Rights Act expressly lists sexual orientation and gender identity or expression as protected classes in housing. These protections are independent of federal law, though they also align with HUD's 2021 reading of the Fair Housing Act's "sex" protection to include sexual orientation and gender identity after the Bostock decision.

How is fair housing enforced in the District, and what are the penalties?

The DC Office of Human Rights enforces the D.C. Human Rights Act and accepts and investigates housing discrimination complaints. A tenant may also pursue a federal Fair Housing Act claim, which can carry federal civil penalties in addition to damages. Because the District's protected-class list is so broad, landlords face exposure from claims that would not even exist in many other states.

Federal authority: 42 U.S.C. § 3604; 24 C.F.R. Part 100. State authority: D.C. Code § 2-1402.21 (D.C. Human Rights Act). Last updated August 28, 2026. For informational purposes only, not legal advice. Fair-housing determinations are highly fact-specific; consult a licensed District of Columbia attorney before making a screening, denial, or eviction decision.