Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 12015030102 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 12015030102 · Charlotte, FL · pop 3,892

Census tract 12015030102 runs through Charlotte. With 3,892 residents, it scores 3.5/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 6% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 25% of renter households, a moderate level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,468 monthly, set against $60,781 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 11% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units1,756
Renter share14.9%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$60,781

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#14 of 46 tracts In Charlotte
Elevated
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#2,737 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Moderate
National
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charlotte and the region

Centroid at 26.9436, -82.2306 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 12015030102 scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
1.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,468 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 12015030102 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 12015030102 risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 030102County: 3.03.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 12015030102

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by Florida eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Charlotte County average of 4.3 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 12015030102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12015030102?

Census tract 12015030102 in Charlotte scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12015030102?

Median gross rent is $1,468/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12015030102?

10.0% of residents in tract 12015030102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,892.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12015030102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 57th, household 25th, minority 25th, housing 7th.
Related