Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Alameda Eviction Risk: Elevated , Tampa

Tract 12057003100 · Hillsborough, FL · pop 2,720 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 12057003100 (Alameda in Tampa, Florida) comes in at 4.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 33% of US census tracts.

About 31% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $567 a month while the average household earns $21,576 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. Renters make up 69% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 48% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,232
Renter share69.2%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate34.0%
Median income$21,576

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Alameda
Very High
Within parent city
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 104 tracts In Tampa
Very High
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 333 tracts In Hillsborough
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#84 of 5,122 tracts In Florida
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tampa and the region

Centroid at 27.9774, -82.4437 · click any tract to drill in

Why Alameda scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tampa
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
34.0% poverty · this tract
8.5
Supply constraint
$567 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tampa
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tampa
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tampa
3.5

How Alameda compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Alameda risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 003100Tampa: 2.72.7Tampaparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 457Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 9.71%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.9%Peak (2010)
  • 36Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 120570031002000: 38 filings (11.59/100 renter HHs)2001: 34 filings (10.37/100 renter HHs)2002: 31 filings (9.45/100 renter HHs)2003: 32 filings (9.76/100 renter HHs)2004: 44 filings (13.41/100 renter HHs)2005: 33 filings (7.64/100 renter HHs)2009: 36 filings (8.33/100 renter HHs)2010: 72 filings (13.90/100 renter HHs)2011: 64 filings (10.13/100 renter HHs)2015: 37 filings (5.85/100 renter HHs)2016: 36 filings (6.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 143Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.55×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-01-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.76× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Tacoma, WA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Alameda. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Alameda

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 8.5/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tampa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hillsborough County average of 5.1 and in line with the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.55x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 457 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 9.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.9% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 12057003100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12057003100?

Census tract 12057003100 in the Alameda neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 12057003100?

Median gross rent is $567/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 12057003100?

34.0% of residents in tract 12057003100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,720.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 12057003100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 90th, minority 94th, housing 58th.
Q5

Is tract 12057003100 considered part of Alameda?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 12057003100 fall within Alameda (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 12057003100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 457 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 12057003100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.71% of renter households, peaking at 13.9% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 12057003100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.55× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Tacoma, WA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 12057003100 compare to Tampa overall?

Tract 12057003100 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Tampa at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tampa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 12057003100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 75% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tampa

Top eight tracts in Tampa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related