Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Paisley Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 12069030111 · Lake, FL · pop 1,954 · 24% of tract blocks fall in Paisley
Tract 12069030111, home to 1,954 residents in Paisley, scores 3.3/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #80,805 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 31% of renter households, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,173 monthly, set against $81,919 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 18% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units764
Renter share18.2%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$81,919
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
23
th percentile
Low
Within state
20
th percentile
Very Low
National
17
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Paisley and the region
Centroid at 28.9470, -81.5130 · click any tract to drill in
Why Paisley scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Paisley
4.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Florida legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,173 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Paisley
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Paisley
1.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Paisley
1.3
How Paisley compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 73%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 51%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Paisley
What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 1.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Paisley, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Lake County average of 4.8 and below the Florida statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 44th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 12069030111
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 12069030111?
Census tract 12069030111 in Paisley scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 12069030111?
Median gross rent is $1,173/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 12069030111?
4.5% of residents in tract 12069030111 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,954.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 12069030111?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 6th, minority 30th, housing 51th.
Q5
How does tract 12069030111 compare to Paisley overall?
Tract 12069030111 scores 2.3/10, higher than the parent city of Paisley at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Paisley; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related