Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Paradise Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Lake City
Tract 13063040407 · Clayton County, GA · pop 4,343 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
13063040407 is a census tract in the Paradise Park area of Lake City, GA. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,343 residents. 28% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Clayton County average of 53.3%.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9%
Stable renters 24%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,663
Renter share33.3%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate15.2%
Median income$70,364
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
7
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
24
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lake City and the region
Centroid at 33.6072, -84.3298 · click any tract to drill in
Why Paradise Park scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lake City
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
15.2% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,245 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lake City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lake City
2.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lake City
1.6
How Paradise Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 71
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 73%Household composition
- 88%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 910Total filings over 11 yrs
- 23.56%Avg annual filing rate
- 35.7%Peak (2008)
- 92Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 51% over the past 11 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 645Total filings 2020-21
- 8.5Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Paradise Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.3%Housing insecurity
- 13.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 26.3%Food insecurity
- 19.9%SNAP enrollment
- 12.8%Transit barriers
- 17.7%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 32.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Paradise Park
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.9/10. Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the high side, local political climate reads 8.7/10.
Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.5/10. Against the Clayton County average of 4.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points. Food insecurity runs 26.3% against 17.8% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 910 evictions over 11 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 22.3% against 14.2% nationally.
Average gross rent is $1,245, 10% above the Lake City average. The worst year on record was 2008, when 35.7% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 23.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 13063040407
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040407?
Census tract 13063040407 in the Paradise Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13063040407?
Median gross rent is $1,245/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040407?
15.2% of residents in tract 13063040407 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,343.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040407?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 73th, minority 88th, housing 35th.
Q5
Is tract 13063040407 considered part of Paradise Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040407 fall within Paradise Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040407?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 910 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040407 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 23.56% of renter households, peaking at 35.7% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 13063040407 struggle to pay rent?
About 22.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 13063040407 compare to Lake City overall?
Tract 13063040407 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Lake City at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lake City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related