Skip to content
Neighborhood · Shannon, GA

Nannie Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 4,536 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.8/10 · range 3.8–3.8

Nannie is a one-tract neighborhood of Shannon, GA and houses 4,536 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.8/10, placing it in the Lower tier. Severe burden reaches 23%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.

What pushes the score up most is tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10. Cost burden runs 26% against 17.4% citywide, putting Nannie 8.6% over its own city.

On the softer side is eviction-process difficulty, at 1.7/10. Running cool is rent-regulation exposure, at 2/10.

The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest. The filing record is not thin: 187 evictions logged in this tract.

Filing activity peaked in 2012 at 7.7% of renter households. Recent filings have not receded much: 7.8% in 2016 against a 7.7% peak.

Average gross rent is $1,012, 7% below the Shannon average of $1,090. Rent takes 17% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market.

33% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

One tract means one number: 3.8/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Nannie vs Shannon How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
26.0% +49%
Shannon: 17.4%
Average gross rent
$1,012 -7%
Shannon: $1,090
Average HH income
$71,267 0%
Shannon: $71,605
Poverty rate
18.7% +102%
Shannon: 9.3%
Renter share
32.9% -31%
Shannon: 47.9%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Nannie and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.8–3.8

Why Nannie scores 3.8

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 2.9–2.9 across tracts
2.9
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 3.7–3.7 across tracts
3.7
Rent control risk
26% of income on rent · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 1.7–1.7 across tracts
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
33% renter households · Range 8.3–8.3 across tracts
8.3
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Economic stress
18.7% below poverty line · Range 4.7–4.7 across tracts
4.7
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Risk score comparison

Nannie vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Nannie score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.8NannieNeighborhood3.7Parent cityhost city4.1Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Nannie

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
13115000100 3.8 4,536 26% $1,012
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 61

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 73%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 82%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 18%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 33%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Nannie

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 187Total filings (sum)
  • 6.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.7%Peak year (2012)
  • 7.83%Latest filed (2016)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Nannie

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Nannie

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Nannie?

Nannie scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Nannie compare to Shannon overall?

Nannie scores 0.1 points higher than Shannon overall (3.7/10). Renters spend 26% of income on rent vs 17% citywide. Average rent: $1,012 vs $1,090.
Q3

What is the average rent in Nannie?

Average gross rent in Nannie is $1,012/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Nannie residents are renters?

33% of Nannie households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Shannon). The neighborhood has 4,536 residents.
Q5

Is Nannie a high social-vulnerability area?

Nannie sits in the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Nannie for landlords?

Nannie carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.8/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Shannon as a whole (3.7/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Nannie?

Nannie has 4,493 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (92.1%), Black (non-Hispanic) (3.1%), Other / Multiracial (2.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Nannie

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further