Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Normandy Eviction Risk: Lower , College Park

Tract 13063040203 · Clayton County, GA · pop 3,933 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Normandy area of College Park anchors census tract 13063040203, which lands at 6.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 89th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 59% of renter households, a severe level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,433 a month against an average household income of $52,295 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 61% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 25% Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,746
Renter share61.3%
SVI overall0.72
Poverty rate5.2%
Median income$52,295

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Normandy
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 7 tracts In College Park
Very Low
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#53 of 70 tracts In Clayton County
Low
Within state
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#1,284 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across College Park and the region

Centroid at 33.6075, -84.4530 · click any tract to drill in

Why Normandy scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from College Park
8.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.5
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
5.2% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,433 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from College Park
7.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from College Park
9.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from College Park
7.9

How Normandy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Normandy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 040203College Park: 3.13.1College Parkparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 72

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 6,040Total filings over 11 yrs
  • 53.74%Avg annual filing rate
  • 56.4%Peak (2008)
  • 607Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130630402032002: 438 filings (26.79/100 renter HHs)2005: 507 filings (44.06/100 renter HHs)2007: 595 filings (51.70/100 renter HHs)2008: 649 filings (56.40/100 renter HHs)2010: 622 filings (66.60/100 renter HHs)2011: 615 filings (67.66/100 renter HHs)2012: 442 filings (48.62/100 renter HHs)2013: 492 filings (54.13/100 renter HHs)2014: 542 filings (59.63/100 renter HHs)2015: 531 filings (58.42/100 renter HHs)2016: 607 filings (57.10/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 39% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 2,512Total filings 2020-21
  • 33.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 55 filings (550.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 73 filings (730.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 33 filings (330.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 26 filings (260.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 62 filings (620.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 58 filings (580.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 47 filings (470.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 37 filings (370.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 80 filings (800.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 27 filings (270.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 50 filings (500.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 46 filings (460.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 41 filings (410.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 48 filings (480.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 71 filings (710.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 44 filings (440.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 24 filings (240.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 30 filings (300.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 101 filings (1,010.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 38 filings (380.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 57 filings (570.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 85 filings (850.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 52 filings (520.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 81 filings (810.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 53 filings (530.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Normandy

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from College Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clayton County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 6,040 eviction filings here over 11 tracked years, with about 53.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 56.4% of renter households in 2008.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 17.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13063040203

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13063040203?

Census tract 13063040203 in the Normandy neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13063040203?

Median gross rent is $1,433/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 59% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13063040203?

5.2% of residents in tract 13063040203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,933.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13063040203?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 72th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 21th, minority 96th, housing 58th.
Q5

Is tract 13063040203 considered part of Normandy?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13063040203 fall within Normandy (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13063040203?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 6,040 eviction filings across 11 validated years in tract 13063040203 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 53.74% of renter households, peaking at 56.4% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13063040203 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13063040203 compare to College Park overall?

Tract 13063040203 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of College Park at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from College Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in College Park

Top eight tracts in College Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related