Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally
Litchfield Hundred Eviction Risk: Lower , Milton
Tract 13121011512 ·
Fulton County, GA · pop 3,229 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
How risky is the Litchfield Hundred area of Milton for landlords? Census tract 13121011512 scores 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 60% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,841 a month against an average household income of $186,563 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 4% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 2%Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,036
Renter share4.2%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate2.9%
Median income$186,563
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Litchfield Hundred
Very Low
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Milton
Moderate
Within county
2th percentile
#321 of 327 tracts In Fulton County
Very Low
Within state
3th percentile
#2,718 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Milton and the region
Centroid at 34.0891, -84.4035 · click any tract to drill in
Why Litchfield Hundred scores 1.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Milton
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
2.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,841 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Milton
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Milton
2.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Milton
6.0
How Litchfield Hundred compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 0
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
2%Socioeconomic
5%Household composition
39%Racial/ethnic minority
1%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
17Total filings 2020-21
0.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Litchfield Hundred. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.3%Housing insecurity
3.3%Utility-shutoff threat
5.3%Food insecurity
3.1%SNAP enrollment
3.8%Transit barriers
5.5%No health insurance
12.3%Frequent mental distress
20.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Litchfield Hundred
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Milton eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Fulton County average of 5.7 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 0th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 5.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 13121011512
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13121011512?
Census tract 13121011512 in the Litchfield Hundred neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13121011512?
Median gross rent is $1,841/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13121011512?
2.9% of residents in tract 13121011512 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,229.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13121011512?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 5th, minority 39th, housing 1th.
Q5
Is tract 13121011512 considered part of Litchfield Hundred?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13121011512 fall within Litchfield Hundred (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13121011512 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13121011512 compare to Milton overall?
Tract 13121011512 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Milton at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Milton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.