Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally
Ashland Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Lawrenceville
Tract 13135050571 ·
Gwinnett County, GA · pop 7,875 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 13135050571 (the Ashland Park neighborhood of Lawrenceville, Georgia) comes in at 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #41,899 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 30% of renter households, a high level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,007 monthly, set against $78,553 in average yearly household income, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 15%Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,516
Renter share21.9%
SVI overall0.50
Poverty rate16.1%
Median income$78,553
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Ashland Park
Very Low
Within county
73th percentile
#61 of 220 tracts In Gwinnett County
Elevated
Within state
45th percentile
#1,525 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
National
39th percentile
#51,553 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lawrenceville and the region
Centroid at 33.9639, -83.9413 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ashland Park scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lawrenceville
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
16.1% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$2,007 rent vs county FMR
6.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lawrenceville
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lawrenceville
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lawrenceville
5.0
How Ashland Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 50
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
69%Socioeconomic
82%Household composition
73%Racial/ethnic minority
5%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
515Total filings 2020-21
6.8Avg monthly (observed)
0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ashland Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
23.5%Housing insecurity
14.3%Utility-shutoff threat
26.9%Food insecurity
21.5%SNAP enrollment
13.4%Transit barriers
20.3%No health insurance
19.0%Frequent mental distress
29.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ashland Park
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lawrenceville eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Gwinnett County average of 5.8 and in line with the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 50th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 23.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 13135050571
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13135050571?
Census tract 13135050571 in the Ashland Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 13135050571?
Median gross rent is $2,007/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 30% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 13135050571?
16.1% of residents in tract 13135050571 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,875.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 13135050571?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 50th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 69th, household 82th, minority 73th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 13135050571 considered part of Ashland Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13135050571 fall within Ashland Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 13135050571 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 13135050571 compare to Lawrenceville overall?
Tract 13135050571 scores 3.4/10, higher than the parent city of Lawrenceville at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lawrenceville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.