Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Hollywood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Brookfield
Tract 17031815600 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 5,462 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 5/10, tract 17031815600 in the Hollywood area of North Riverside, IL reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%Stable renters 16%Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units2,100
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$82,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
57th percentile
#4 of 8 tracts In Hollywood
Elevated
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Brookfield
Moderate
Within county
23th percentile
#1,024 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Low
Within state
51th percentile
#1,600 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Brookfield and the region
Centroid at 41.8450, -87.8240 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Brookfield
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,309 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookfield
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookfield
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookfield
5.0
How Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
61%Socioeconomic
68%Household composition
44%Racial/ethnic minority
53%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
2%Grade B
8%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
14.3%Housing insecurity
7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
17.3%Food insecurity
14.0%SNAP enrollment
8.2%Transit barriers
12.5%No health insurance
14.5%Frequent mental distress
27.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hollywood
The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.8/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.
It sits 1.1 points below the Cook County average of 6.1. The filing record is not thin: 195 evictions over 15 years of observation.
The worst year on record was 2010, when 3.6% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 2.4% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 61st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 6.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
46% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031815600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031815600?
Census tract 17031815600 in the Hollywood neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031815600?
Median gross rent is $1,309/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031815600?
3.6% of residents in tract 17031815600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,462.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031815600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 68th, minority 44th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 17031815600 considered part of Hollywood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031815600 fall within Hollywood (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031815600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 195 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031815600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.37% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031815600 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031815600 compare to Brookfield overall?
Tract 17031815600 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Brookfield at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031815600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.