Within neighborhood
71
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,857 of 84,120 nationally
Hollywood Eviction Risk: Moderate , Brookfield
Tract 17031815600 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,462 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 17031815600 sits in the Hollywood neighborhood of Brookfield, Illinois. It has a population of 5,462 and an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). 46% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 22% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $1,309/month against a median household income of $82,063 — roughly 19% rent-to-income at the medians.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units2,100
Renter share29.5%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$82,063
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
27
th percentile
Low
Within state
52
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Brookfield and the region
Centroid at 41.8450, -87.8240 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Brookfield
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,309 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookfield
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookfield
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookfield
5.0
How Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 61%Socioeconomic
- 68%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 195Total filings over 15 yrs
- 2.37%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.6%Peak (2010)
- 17Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 750% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hollywood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 14.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.3%Food insecurity
- 14.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.2%Transit barriers
- 12.5%No health insurance
- 14.5%Frequent mental distress
- 27.8%Any disability
Frequently asked
About tract 17031815600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031815600?
Census tract 17031815600 in the Hollywood neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031815600?
Median gross rent is $1,309/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031815600?
3.6% of residents in tract 17031815600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,462.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031815600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 68th, minority 44th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 17031815600 considered part of Hollywood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031815600 fall within Hollywood (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031815600?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 195 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031815600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.37% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031815600 struggle to pay rent?
About 14.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031815600 compare to Brookfield overall?
Tract 17031815600 scores 5.4/10 — higher than the parent city of Brookfield at 5.0/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 17031815600 historically redlined?
Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related